There's an ardent discussion going on around these parts. Are these the worst Oscars ever, as they are so stultifyingly bad, or is the fact that they are so creatively, so fascinatingly bad bring them up to a level of greatness?
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834adc24169e20112790584f728a4
Comments
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Worst Oscars EVER.
Posted by: Eileen C. | Sunday, February 22, 2009 at 10:58 PM
I hear you. But you must admit that the curtain is STUNNING.
Posted by: the_movie_empress | Sunday, February 22, 2009 at 11:10 PM
See, I thought they were great. Some technical difficulties, but I was glad to see them branch out and do some things differently.
I thought the year my beloved did it, I mean Jon Stewart did it, it was worse. (Was that last year?)
Posted by: Jackie | Monday, February 23, 2009 at 12:29 AM
Yup, last year. I don't think this year's cast last year's in any better light, but they lost me completely around the musical montage number. And I *love* musicals.
Posted by: the_movie_empress | Monday, February 23, 2009 at 05:40 AM